<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MikeLin.ca &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikelin.ca/blog/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikelin.ca/blog</link>
	<description>The Blog Lives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:04:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives Are Bad for Science</title>
		<link>http://www.mikelin.ca/blog/2008/02/conservatives-are-bad-for-science/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mikelin.ca/blog/2008/02/conservatives-are-bad-for-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Non-tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikelin.ca/blog/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The journal Nature has come out about how bad the Conservative government has been for science in Canada. For example, they&#8217;ve decided to close the office of national science advisor, and replace it with a less independent 18-member council containing both scientists and administrators. And then there&#8217;s climate change: Concerns can only be enhanced by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The journal Nature has come out about <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v451/n7181/full/451866a.html#top">how bad the Conservative government has been for science in Canada</a>.</p>
<p>For example, they&#8217;ve decided to close the office of national science advisor, and replace it with a less independent 18-member council containing both scientists and administrators. And then there&#8217;s climate change:</p>
<blockquote><p>Concerns can only be enhanced by the government&#8217;s manifest disregard for science. Since prime minister Stephen Harper came to power, his government has been sceptical of the science on climate change and has backed away from Canada&#8217;s Kyoto commitment. In January, it muzzled Environment Canada&#8217;s scientists, ordering them to route all media enquires through Ottawa to control the agency&#8217;s media message. Last week, the prime minister and members of the cabinet failed to attend a ceremony to honour the Canadian scientists who contributed to the international climate-change report that won a share of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize.</p></blockquote>
<p>Anyway read the article. I&#8217;m scared of politicians disregarding science, because it means they want the evidence to fit their policy and not the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mikelin.ca/blog/2008/02/conservatives-are-bad-for-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
